The 1971 Constitution:
Real Change Made In The Lives Of Virginians

“Some forty years having passed since the 1928 revision of the Constitution of 1902, the General Assembly in 1968, at the suggestion of Governor Mills E. Godwin, Jr., created a Commission on Constitutional Revision to ‘study the Constitution of Virginia and propose such revision of the same as in its opinion will be for the best interest of the Commonwealth.’ This action reflected recognition that Virginia’s urbanization, industrialization and growth in population had brought demands upon the government which required a careful reexamination of the organic law.”

INTRODUCTION

Why was revision necessary?

The 1971 Virginia Constitution was introduced to replace the long–standing and seldom–changed Constitution of 1902. Aside from a revision in 1928, which was necessary to implement the 19th amendment prohibiting the denial of the right to vote based on sex, the law of Virginia reflected institutionalized segregation, restricted voting rights, and maintained racial and gendered inequality. Decades after the '28 revision, then Governor Mills E. Godwin, Jr. created a Commission on Constitutional Revision (CCR) in 1968 to reflect "recognition that Virginia's urbanization, industrialization, and growth in population had brought demands upon the government which required a careful reexamination of the organic laws." Essentially, the precedents set by the U.S. Supreme Court throughout the 1960s, and the decisions of Congress in the same decade, created a need for a total reevaluation of the laws that governed daily life and practice in Virginia.

Library of Virginia [LibraryofVa]. 2021, July 8. A Brief History of Four Virginia Constitutions [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/V7b4Jqec43o

What was the process of achieving revision?

Before the 1902 Constitution could be overhauled into a completely new document, Governor Godwin’s appointed committee, including Alexander M. Harman Jr., Colgate W. Darden, Albertis S. Harrison, Davis Y. Paschall, Ted Dalton, Oliver W. Hill, J. Sloan Kuykendall, Albert V. Bryan Jr., Lewis F. Powell Jr., Hardy C. Dillard, George M. Cochran, and A. E. Dick Howard, reviewed the current constitution, and on January 1, 1969 “the Commission recommended major revisions of the constitution and proposed specific language for each article of the new document.” The recommendations of the CCR not only included the revision of current sections, but also suggested that outdated sections on the maintenance of racial inequality and segregation be removed entirely.

Members of the Commission on Constitutional Revision, 1968-1970: (seated) Alexander M. Harman Jr., Colgate W. Darden, Albertis S. Harrison, Davis Y. Paschall, Ted Dalton, Oliver W. Hill; and (standing) J. Sloan Kuykendall, Albert V. Bryan Jr., Lewis F. Powell Jr., Hardy C. Dillard, George M. Cochran and A. E. Dick Howard. UVA Law Special Collections
Members of the Commission on Constitutional Revision, 1968–1970: (seated) Alexander M. Harman Jr., Colgate W. Darden, Albertis S. Harrison, Davis Y. Paschall, Ted Dalton, Oliver W. Hill; and (standing) J. Sloan Kuykendall, Albert V. Bryan Jr., Lewis F. Powell Jr., Hardy C. Dillard, George M. Cochran and A. E. Dick Howard. UVA Law Special Collections

What happened once the process was initiated?

Once the Commission on Constitutional Revision proposed their suggested revisions, substitutions, and amendments, the General Assembly of VA met in special sessions to discuss primarily and in some cases exclusively the suggestions set before them by the Commission. In the state senate, each article was referred to a specific committee. For example, the Committee on Privileges and Elections considered the contents of Articles I, II, and XII, while the Committee on Education debated the language in Article VIII. Once a consensus had been reached, the Article was sent to the House for a similar debate. If changes were suggested the process would start again back in the house, and if not the Articles were then set before the Senate committee chairs and a comparable committee appointed by the House for packaging in order for a formal proposal to the people to be presented. This formal packaging was presented and readily available to each Virginian who wished to receive a copy in order to make an informed decision on whether to reject or ratify the new Constitution. It is important to note that the process by which the 1971 Constitution was introduced was not a Constitutional Convention, although many Virginians of the time believed that to be the case. The major distinction is that should this have been a Constitutional Convention, the changes to the constitution would have been implemented without the vote of the people. Virginians expressed different views about the new Constitution.

'Virginia Constitutional Revision: A Plan to Destroy Our Local Government & Enslave Our People' by T. Dix Sutton. From Virginia. Governor (1970-1974: Holton), Executive Papers, 1970-1974. Accessions 28050, Box 40, 'Before Inauguration' Folder. Library of Virginia.
"Virginia Constitutional Revision: A Plan to Destroy Our Local Government & Enslave Our People" by T. Dix Sutton. From Virginia. Governor (1970-1974: Holton), Executive Papers, 1970-1974. Accessions 28050, Box 40, "Before Inauguration" Folder. Library of Virginia.
'VOTE YES For a New Constitution for Virginia: Virginians will Vote on Four Proposals November 3,' Published by The League of Women Voters of Virginia. From Virginia. Governor (1970–1974: Holton), Executive Papers, 1970–1974. Accessions 28050, Box 40, 'Before Inauguration' Folder. Library of Virginia.
"VOTE YES For a New Constitution for Virginia: Virginians will Vote on Four Proposals November 3," Published by The League of Women Voters of Virginia. From Virginia. Governor (1970–1974: Holton), Executive Papers, 1970–1974. Accessions 28050, Box 40, "Before Inauguration" Folder. Library of Virginia.
The Virginia Voter, Vol. XVIII, No. 2, September 1970. Published by The League of Women Voters of Virginia. From Virginia. Governor (1970–1974: Holton), Executive Papers, 1970–1974. Accessions 28050, Box 40, 'Before Inauguration' Folder. Library of Virginia.
The Virginia Voter, Vol. XVIII, No. 2, September 1970. Published by The League of Women Voters of Virginia. From Virginia. Governor (1970–1974: Holton), Executive Papers, 1970–1974. Accessions 28050, Box 40, "Before Inauguration" Folder. Library of Virginia.
On November 3, 1970, 71.8% of the people of Virginia overwhelmingly voted to ratify the changes to the constitution. View the votes by county in the Virginia Department of Elections’ Historical Elections Database.

What happened after the vote?

On July 1, 1971, the new constitution went into effect. We are now in the 50th year of the Constitution, having since changed to allow for the 26th amendment which lowered the voting age to eighteen. The rest of this website will examine three major revisions included in the 1971 constitution: the expansion of voting rights, the evolution of the Virginia public education system, and the social equity promised to the people of Virginia with the implementation of the revisions.

Library of Virginia [LibraryofVa]. 2021, July 1. Looking Back, Looking Forward: The 50th Anniversary of the Virginia Constitution [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/Kc0wM83s_SU

EDUCATION

The last constitutional rewrite took place in 1902. Although it was subject to revisions since, the articles were filled with the oppressive and racist language of the white supremacist leaders that wanted to reinstitute slavery.

Excerpt from Virginia Constitutional Convention (1901–1902), Constitution, 1902. Accession 40664. State government records collection, The Library of Virginia. Accessed online.
Excerpt from Virginia Constitutional Convention (1901–1902), Constitution, 1902. Accession 40664. State government records collection, The Library of Virginia. Accessed online.

Brown v. Board was the landmark, unanimous Supreme Court decision that overturned the Plessy v. Ferguson ruling of separate but equal in regard to public education. Five separate court cases from five different states, all regarding school segregation, were compiled to form what is commonly known as Brown v. Board. Out of all five cases, only one was actually led by students, the only case from Virginia, Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County.

Protest Sign at Robert Russa Moton High School. Richmond News Leader, April 30, 1951. Accessed on Encyclopedia Virginia.
Protest Sign at Robert Russa Moton High School. Richmond News Leader, April 30, 1951. Accessed on Encyclopedia Virginia: https://encyclopediavirginia.org/272hpr-b9c045b94e9dfe2/.

Over 450 Black high school students crowded into a one-story brick building containing eight classrooms, a single office, an auditorium, and a suggested maximum occupancy of 180 people. When it rained students had to use umbrellas inside to keep dry due to roof leakage. The building was heated with wood stoves. Due to overcrowding, three temporary tar paper shacks were built to hold classes. The highest-paid teacher earned less than the lowest-paid white teacher in the county. Robert Russa Moton High School’s lacking conditions in comparison to the white high schools in Prince Edward County were the catalyst for 16-year-old Barbara Rose Johns to lead the student body in a strike demanding that the school board build them a better school. Little did they know, their efforts would eventually become one of the Supreme Court Cases in Brown v. Board.

"Barbara Johns," Virginia Changemakers, Accessed: https://edu.lva.virginia.gov/changemakers/items/show/121.

Timeline from Davis to the New Constitution

  • 1951

    April 23, 1951

    Barbara Rose Johns led over 450 students in a two-week protest of deplorable school conditions at Robert Russa Moton High School, an all-Black high school in Farmville, Virginia. They were requesting a new, better school to be built to adequately accommodate the needs of students and teachers, comparable to all-white high schools.

  • 1951

    May 23, 1951

    Johns and classmate Carrie Stokes sought legal counsel from the Richmond NAACP. Lawyers Oliver Hill and Spottswood Robinson filed suit on behalf of 117 students in the Prince Edward County School District to integrate schools. Asking for Section 140 of the 1902 Virginia State Constitution which stated that “white and colored children shall not be taught in the same schools” to be struck down on the grounds that it violated the 14th amendment of the United States Constitution. While the student strike led by Barbara Johns was the impetus for the case against Prince Edward County School Board, 14-year-old freshman Dorothy Davis was the first plaintiff, resulting in the case being named Davis et. al. v. County School Board of Prince Edward County. This was the only case out of the five cases that comprised Brown v. Board to be initiated by a student-led effort. A three-judge panel in the U.S. District Court presided over the case, unanimously rejecting it and stating “We have found no harm to either race.”

  • 1952

    May 5, 1952

    NAACP attorneys appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court and the case was eventually argued with four other cases: Belton (Bulah) v. Gebhart [Delaware], Bolling v. Sharpe [District of Columbia], Brown v. Board of Education [Kansas], Briggs v. Elliot [South Carolina]. These cases would collectively become known as Brown v. Board.

  • 1954

    May 17, 1954

    With a 9-0 vote, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled segregation in public schools unconstitutional, reversing all prior school segregation court rulings. While this was a groundbreaking decision, there was no direction for the implementation of school desegregation.

  • 1955

    May 31, 1955

    In a decision known as Brown v. Board of Education II, the U.S. Supreme Court directed district courts and school boards to desegregate schools “with all deliberate speed.” This vague language supported the attitudes and politics of Virginia’s conservative Democratic leadership under the infamous “Byrd Machine,'' led by former Governor and U.S. Senator Harry F. Byrd. Conservative politicians established systems in opposition to integration, known as Massive Resistance.

  • 1955

    November 1955

    Virginia Governor Thomas B. Stanely, with the help of an appointed commission, had already begun coming up with potential methods of defying school integration. The Gray Commission, chaired and named after Virginia State Senator Garland Gray, proposed the following: An amendment to the state constitution’s attendance law, making it illegal to require children to attend integrated schools Provide tuition grants for white parents to send their children to private schools Allow the Governor to close public schools to avoid integration Establish a Pupil Placement Board to individually assign students to prospective schools and approving transfer requests Recommendations from The Gray Commission and Gov. Stanley were passed by the General Assembly as the segregationist legislative package known as The Stanley Plan. 1956 - By the start of the school year, Virginia voters overwhelmingly approved the propositions by the Gray Commission, in addition to forbidding any integrated school to receive state funding, legalized by the Stanley Plan, to circumvent the integration of public schools. "If we can organize the Southern States for Massive Resistance to this order I think that in time the rest of the country will realize that racial integration is not going to be accepted in the South." Newport News (Va.) Daily Press, “Byrd Calls for ‘Massive’ Resistance to Integration,” February 26, 1956. White southerners were yet again fighting to uphold racism and segregation in the name of “states rights,” this time utilizing the doctrine of interposition, whereby the state “interposes” between the federal government and people of said state, preventing the federal government from enforcing laws the state deems unconstitutional.

  • 1957

    Consolidated cases from Norfolk school district heard by U.S. District Court declared the Pupil Placement Act Unconstitutional but it continued in effect as the ruling was being appealed and the school year continued. The nine Black students who bravely integrated Little Rock Central High, against resistance from Governor Faubus, were proof to stubborn Virginians that President Eisenhower was not against the use of the National Guard to enforce compliance with federal integration mandates. However, in November 1957, Virginia elected J. Lindsay Almond, another member of the “Byrd Machine,” as the successor to Governor Stanley.

  • 1958

    Visual Studies Collection, Library of Virginia.
    Visual Studies Collection, Library of Virginia.
    -->

    Governor Almond took office that January. Federal Courts ordered public schools in Warren County, Charlottesville, Norfolk, and Arlington County to integrate, but localities appealed and started the year a month late, or certain schools were forced to close by Governor Almond. During the school closure, Norfolk’s size and lack of resources made it harder to educate the 10,000 students who relied on public schools. Nearly one-third of the students went completely uneducated. In richer localities like Charlottesville and Warren, neighborhoods, communities, and philanthropic organizations banded together to educate the youth until schools reopened.

  • 1959

    February 2, 1959

    Northern Virginia Sun, 22(103), 2 February 1959. Scans provided by the Center for Local History, Arlington Public Library. Accessed: virginiachronicle.com
    Northern Virginia Sun, 22(103), 2 February 1959. Scans provided by the Center for Local History, Arlington Public Library. Accessed: virginiachronicle.com

    Four African American students enroll in a previously all-white school in Arlington; Seventeen African American students enroll in a previously all-white school in Norfolk. Gov. Almond does not intervene and the students attend school peacefully. Massive Resistance begins to fail in Virginia but it would take years for schools to fully integrate.

  • 1960

    The original Pupil Placement Board members resigned due to several appeals of the constitutionality of the Pupil Placement Act. New members were appointed to the Pupil Placement Board and the General Assembly wouldn’t completely dismantle it until 1966. The new Freedom Choice Plan allowed families to choose which public school to attend, but practical issues such as lack of transportation as well as fear and intimidation contributed to continued segregation.

  • 1964-65

    Return Student Figures, 1964, Box 4, Folder 20. Records of the Virginia Pupil Placement Board, 1957–1966. Accession 26517, State records collection, The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Va.
    Return Student Figures, 1964, Box 4, Folder 20. Records of the Virginia Pupil Placement Board, 1957–1966. Accession 26517, State records collection, The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Va.
    -->

    Slow but ongoing integration efforts in Virginia were being compounded nationally with the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. National pressure helped hasten Virginia’s stalled integration practices. Unlike other states, Virginia didn’t require National Guard intervention despite its failure to abide by federal law.

  • 1968

    The Supreme Court case Green v. County School Board of New Kent County quickened the pace of desegregation in Virginia. Not only did this ruling outlaw the Freedom Choice Plan but also led to controversial new bussing schemes to expedite integration.

    In the late 1960’s Black and white neighborhoods were still racially segregated making it easier for suburban white students to attend segregation academies and inner-city Black students to attend the “desegregated” public city schools. To attempt to curb the continued white flight, court-ordered bussing transported white students to city schools and Black students to county schools. For a host of reasons, Black and white parents were not in favor of transportation past city-county lines. Failed bussing schemes resulted in neighborhood schooling plans, similar to the current workings of public schools.

  • 1970

    The election of Republican Linwood Holton as governor in 1969 signaled an end to the conservative Democrat Byrd Machine, which had held power for much of the 20th century. Holton served as Virginia’s governor from 1970 to 1974, during which time his children were enrolled in the predominantly Black Richmond Public Schools.

  • 1971

    July 1, 1971

    Gov. Holton continued the work begun by Gov. Godwin to revise the Virginia state constitution. The Commission on Constitutional Revision worked from 1968 until 1970 and recommended many improvements to ensure quality education for all of Virginia’s youths. The new state constitution was overwhelmingly passed by voters in Virginia and went into effect on July 1, 1971.



ABOUT

1971 Virginia Constitution Project

Over the summer of 2021, student interns conducted a self-directed research project using the Library of Virginia collections and other resources to explore the effects of the 1971 Constitution fifty years after its ratification. Interns developed or strengthened their archival research skills, furthered their critical thinking within a digital humanities framework, and polished their presentation skills as part of the 1971 Constitution Project. They also developed collaborative skills as part of a professional team, with several key Library staff members supporting and mentoring their development. With the help of LVA staff, interns complete a digital project – website, data visualization, digital mapping, or other online resource – that is widely accessible to many different audiences. The 1971 Constitution Project interns decided to collaborate on a single website with different sections.


The Constitution Project team, including interns and staff, also explored diverse careers within cultural heritage institutions and different methods of working with history through guest speakers, which informed their final digital project.


The Constitution Project internships are funded through a generous donation to the Library of Virginia Foundation.


Constitution Project Interns

Joellen Ceide is a VCU graduate student in History with a focus on the Civil Rights Movement. Joellen holds a bachelor's degree in History from James Madison University. She is already an experienced researcher at the Library through her work on school desegregation in New Kent County.


Kofi Mason is an accomplished student and Black Student Union president at Albemarle High School. He is interested in the education and empowerment of Black youth as well as technology and coding.

    Library of Virginia Staff:
  • Sonya Coleman, Digital Engagement + Social Media Coordinator
  • Kris Arneson, Web Developer
  • Roger Christman, State Records Archivist
  • Ashley Ramey, Community Outreach Specialist
  • Kathy Jordan, Director of Digital Initiatives and Web Presence

    Guest Speakers:
  • Dr. Sesha Joi Moon and Enjoli Moon, The JXN Project
  • Alfonso Acosta Perez, Artist, Mending Walls Project
  • Dr. Sylvio Lynch III, Artist, Project Curator - African American Voices Initiative (AAVI) at Maymont

REFERENCES

Eskridge, S. (2010). Virginia's Pupil Placement Board and the Practical Applications of Massive Resistance, 1956-1966. The Virginia Magazine of History and Biography, 118(3), 246-276. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20788089.

Hershman, C. J. H. (2020, December 7). Massive resistance. Encyclopedia Virginia. Retrieved September 14, 2021, from https://encyclopediavirginia.org/entries/massive-resistance/.

Lee, C. B. E., & Daugherity, C. B. J. (2020, December 14). Farmville Protests of 1963. Encyclopedia Virginia. Retrieved September 14, 2021, from https://encyclopediavirginia.org/entries/farmville-protests-of-1963/.

National Archives and Records Administration. (2021, June 7). Photographs from the Dorothy Davis Case. National Archives and Records Administration. Retrieved September 14, 2021, from https://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/davis-case#background.

Records of the Virginia Pupil Placement Board, 1957-1966. Accession 26517, State records collection, The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Va.

VCU Libraries. (2021, September 14). Freedom Now Project. Flickr. Retrieved September 14, 2021, from https://www.flickr.com/photos/freedom_now_project/sets/.

Virginia. Governor (1970-1974 : Holton), Executive Papers, 1970-1974. Accession 28050, 28101, 29488, and 28795, State government records collection, The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.

Virginia. Governor (1966-1970 : Godwin), Executive Papers, 1966-1970. Accession 27210 and 27780, State government records collection, The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.

Virginia Department of Elections. (n.d.). Virginia Elections Database " 1970 - Question 1". Virginia Elections Database. Retrieved September 14, 2021, from https://historical.elections.virginia.gov/ballot_questions/view/3526/.

Woltz, C. K. (1971). Proceedings and debates pertaining to amendment of the Constitution, extra session 1969, regular session, 1970. Dept. of Purchases and Supply.

Political Cartoon – Seibel, 1957, Box 4, Folder 10. Records of the Virginia Pupil Placement Board, 1957–1966. Accession 26517, State records collection, The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Va.

Visual Studies Collection, Library of Virginia.

Northern Virginia Sun, 22(103), 2 February 1959. Scans provided by the Center for Local History, Arlington Public Library. Accessed: virginiachronicle.com

Return Student Figures, 1964, Box 4, Folder 20. Records of the Virginia Pupil Placement Board, 1957–1966. Accession 26517, State records collection, The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Va.

Annotated Map of Bus Routes for George W. Watkins School; Charles C. Green, et al v. New Kent County School Board of Education et al; Civil Case Files, 1938 – 12/31/1998; Records of District Courts of the United States, Record Group 21; National Archives at Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA. [Online Version, https://www.docsteach.org/documents/document/map2-new-kent-county-bus-routes]